Debra Feaster v. Federal Express Corporation, No. 14-2025 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2025 DEBRA FEASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:13-cv-02517-DCN) Submitted: March 24, 2015 Decided: March 31, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Debra Feaster, Appellant Pro Se. Lucille Lattimore Nelson, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charleston, South Carolina; Patrick Daniel Riederer, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Debra Feaster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Federal Express Corporation on her claims of a hostile work environment and discrimination, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2012), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Feaster v. Fed. Express Corp., Aug. dispense No. 2:13-cv-02517-DCN with contentions are oral argument adequately (D.S.C. because presented in the the 28, facts 2014). We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.