Rose Mezu v. Morgan State University, No. 14-1911 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1911 ROSE URE MEZU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; ARMADA W. GRANT, in her personal capacity and as Director, Human Resources/Payroll for Morgan State University; DOLAN HUBBARD, in his personal capacity and as Chair, Department of English and Language Arts, Morgan State University, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-02855-WMN; 1:11-cv-03072-WMN) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. Valerie Ibe, LAW OFFICES OF C. VALERIE IBE, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Thomas Faulk, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rose Ure Mezu appeals the district court’s judgment and its order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motions, after a jury found in Defendants’ favor on Mezu’s claims alleging retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), interference Medical and with Leave her Act, retaliation in violation rights guaranteed U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 29 by, the (2012). of, and Family We and have considered the parties’ arguments and have reviewed the record and find district no reversible court’s error. judgment Accordingly, and order. Mezu we v. affirm Morgan the State Univ., Nos. 1:09-cv-02855-WMN; 1:11-cv-03072-WMN (D. Md. filed Jun. 13, dispense 2014, with contentions are entered oral Jun. argument adequately 23, 2014; because presented in Aug. the the 21, facts 2014. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.