H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates, No. 14-1578 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1578 H. RICHARD AUSTIN, St. Louis, Missouri, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOUGLAS G. PETERSON & ASSOCIATES, Greenfield, Massachusetts; STEPHEN W. HOUGHTON, Greenfield, Massachusetts; JIMMY PAU, Cary, North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00877-BO) Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. H. Richard Austin, Appellant Pro Se. George L. Goodridge, CURTISS, CAREY, GATES, GRAVES & GOODRIDGE, LLP, Greenfield, Massachusetts; Paul Marshall Yoder, WHARTON ALDHIZER & WEAVER, PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: H. Richard Austin appeals from the district court s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. Peterson 2014). legal before & Assocs., No. we affirm for the Austin v. Douglas G. 5:13-cv-00877-BO (E.D.N.C. May 12, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.