Christopher Julian v. USDA, No. 14-1480 (4th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1480 CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN; RENEE G. JULIAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES RIGNEY, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer; RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager; WANDA JOHNSON, Virginia Agricultural Mediation Program Project Director; J. CALVIN PARRISH, USDA Farm Service Agency State Executive Director; JERRY L. KING, USDA National Appeals Division Hearing Officer; BARBARA MCLEAN; CHRIS P. BEYERHELM, USDA Farm Service Agency Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan Programs; ROGER KLURFELD, USDA National Appeals Division Director, Defendants - Appellees. No. 14-1925 CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN; RENEE G. JULIAN, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES RIGNEY, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer; RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager; WANDA JOHNSON, Virginia Agricultural Mediation Program Project Director; J. CALVIN PARRISH, USDA Farm Service Agency State Executive Director; JERRY L. KING, USDA National Appeals Division Hearing Officer; BARBARA MCLEAN; CHRIS P. BEYERHELM, USDA Farm Service Agency Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan Programs; Director, ROGER KLURFELD, USDA National Appeals Division Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:13-cv-00054-JLK-RSB) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014 Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher B. Julian; Renee G. Julian, Appellants Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Katherine Michelle DeCoster, Assistant Attorney General, Abingdon, Virginia; Rhodes Beahm Ritenour, Deputy Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Christopher B. Julian and Renee G. Julian appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their civil complaint against the United States Department of federal employees, and one state employee. record and find no reversible error. Agriculture, seven We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Julian v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00054-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2014; Aug. 15, 2014). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
