Vickie Mills v. CCL, No. 14-1419 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1419 VICKIE G. MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CCL; LGH; COM.; SLEEP STUDY; FOOT DOC. DR. MINTON; DR. COX; INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINICS; IMAGING; XRAY; CATHERIZATION HEART DOCTOR; MCCLANAHAN STREET, SW; OB-GYN; NEUROLOGY; CCL BRAMBLETON PHYS. ALL DOCTORS; CCL 1314 PETERSCREEK RD.; GILE MEMORIAL EAR, NOSE, THROAT CLINIC; ALL EMPLOYEES (SOME) FIRE DEPT. EMT, Employees Site Center Employees; CARILION ROANOKE COMMUNITY HOSPITALS CLINICS; LEWIS-GALE INTERNAL MEDICINE; CARILION OB-GYN; CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF VIRGINIA; GILL MEMORIAL EAR, NOSE, THROAT CLINIC; LEWIS-GALE EAR, NOSE, THROAT CLINIC; LEWIS-GALE NEUROLOGY, Defendants - Appellees. No. 14-1421 VICKIE G. MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL; SALEM NURSING REHAB; RALEIGH COURT REHAB; CCL; LGH; COM; INTERNAL MEDICINES CLINIC, Jefferson Street, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:14-cv-00198-MFU; 7:14-cv-00183-MFU) Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vickie G. Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Vickie G. Mills appeals the district court s orders dismissing her civil actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mills v. CCL, No. 7:14- cv-00198-MFU; Mills v. Veterans Admin. Hosp., No. 7:14-cv-00183MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.