Juanita L. Jones v. J. Calvin Hill, No. 14-1287 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1287 JUANITA L. JONES, a/k/a Juanita L. Owens, Plaintiff Appellant, v. J. CALVIN HILL, Judge District Court 28; JULIE M. KEPPLE; PATRICIA K. YOUNG; CITY OF ASHEVILLE; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; JOHN DOE; CHARLES E. BARNARD; ANNIE M. BARNARD; BUNCOMBE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; DREW REISINGER, Register of Deeds; BOARD OF SURVEYORS; NATION STAR MORTGAGE; PETER HENRY; ALAN STYLES; UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, agent of Paul Swank; GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, a/k/a ArrowHead General Insurance Agency; DISTRICT COURT OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00328-MR-DLH) Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juanita L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ervin L. Ball, Jr., BALL, BARDEN & BELL, PA, Asheville, North Carolina; William E. Loose, Asheville, North Carolina; Curtis William Euler, Asheville, North Carolina; Patricia Shields, HEDRICK, GARDNER, KINCHELOE & GAROFALO, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Michael T. Hosmer, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Peter Randle Henry, Asheville, North Carolina; Ann Cox Rowe, James G. Welsh, Jr., DAVIS & HAMRICK, LLP, Winston Salem, North Carolina; Courtney C. Britt, TEAGUE, CAMPBELL, DENNIS & GORHAM, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Juanita L. Jones seeks to appeal the district court s orders of March 17, 2014 and March 21, 2014 denying her various motions in this civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Jones seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.