Antonio Bradley v. Salisbury Police Department, No. 13-8061 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-8061 ANTONIO BRADLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SALISBURY POLICE DEPARTMENT; BRYN MAWR, Officer; CORPORAL UNDERWOOD; B. CATON, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03364-GLR) Submitted: March 17, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Bradley § 1983 district (2006) court s complaint order his prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible district U.S.C. the dismissing error. 42 appeals without Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. See Bradley v. Salisbury 1:13-cv-03364-GLR (D. Md. Dec. 13, 2013). Police Dep t, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.