US v. Michael Williams, No. 13-7913 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7913 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL CRANDALE WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00009-H-1) Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 26, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Crandale Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district court s order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c)(2) (2012) and reducing his sentence to the low end of his amended Guidelines range. * record and find no reversible error. district court s order. See We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm the United States 2:95-cr-00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2013). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials v. Williams, No. We dispense with legal contentions are before this and court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Williams contends he is entitled to a further reduction. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.