Jimmy Jones v. Gary Lane, No. 13-7243 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7243 JIMMY DEAN JONES, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY LANE; CORPORAL BETTY RODGERS; LEVIGNE; INVESTIGATOR DONALD LANE, LIEUTENANT LAWRENCE Defendants Appellees, and TIM RILEY, Warden; TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al.; LAURA CALDWELL; MRS. NANCY BYRD; DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER R.L. TURNER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01033-JMC) Submitted: November 19, 2013 Before WYNN and Circuit Judge. FLOYD, Circuit Decided: November 22, 2013 Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. and HAMILTON, Senior Jimmy D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes Burton, GIBBES & BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Jimmy Dean Jones appeals the district court s order accepting the dismissing recommendation without prejudice of the Jones 42 magistrate U.S.C. judge ยง 1983 and (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Lane, No. 1:12-cv-01033-JMC (D.S.C. June 26, 2013). We grant Jones motion to file a supplemental informal reply brief and deny his motion for appointment of counsel. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.