Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke, No. 13-7056 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7056 BRADLEY MAXWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE; JAMES PARKS; GEORGE HINKLE; GREGORY HALLOWAY; DAVID ZOOK; R.C. MATHENA; DENNIS COLLINS; T. FARRIS; B. D. COLLINS; J. W. CARICO; C. L. STACY; R. C. WILLIAMS; H. R. HENSLEY; M. COUNTS; BRENDA RAVIZER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:12-cv-00477-JLK-RSB) Submitted: September 24, 2013 Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: Circuit September 27, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bradley Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court s order denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ( RLUIPA ). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:12-cv-00477- JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. June 13, 2013). appoint facts counsel and materials legal before and dispense We deny Maxwell s motion to with oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court because presented would not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.