Raheem Rahman v. Bobby Shearin, No. 13-6993 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6993 RAHEEM RAHMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; CHAPLAIN LAMP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00526-WMN) Submitted: October 9, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. FLOYD, Circuit Decided: Judges, and October 28, 2013 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raheem Abdul Rahman, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raheem denying which relief he Rahman on his asserted appeals 42 the U.S.C. claims of district § 1983 religious court s (2006) order complaint, discrimination, in and finding that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court s determination that Rahman failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED Rahman also sought to appeal the district court s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over an appeal from that motion because Rahman did not file a new notice of appeal or amend his notice of appeal to embrace the district court s order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.