US v. Luther J. McLoyd, No. 13-6850 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6850 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LUTHER J. MCLOYD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:94-cr-00070-BO-16) Submitted: September 24, 2013 Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: Circuit September 27, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luther J. McLoyd, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, Robert J. Higdon, Jr., Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Luther J. McLoyd appeals the district court s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the relief McLoyd sought. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) (stating standard of review). we affirm the denial of McLoyd s § 3582(c)(2) Accordingly, motion. See United States v. McLoyd, No. 4:94 cr 00070 BO-16 (E.D.N.C. filed May 2, 2013 & entered May 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.