Gary Williams v. Circuit Court, No. 13-6716 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6716 GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR CITY OF SUFFOLK, Defendant - Appellee. No. 13-6718 GARY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SUFFOLK CIRCUIT COURT, Defendant Appellee, and COMMONWEALTH, Defendant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:11-cv-00125-HEH; 3:12-cv-00078-HEH) Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013 Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Buterra Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Gary orders Buterra remanding his Williams state appeals the prosecutions to denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions. record and find no reversible error. district state court s court and We have reviewed the Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Circuit Court for City of Suffolk, No. 3:11-cv-00125-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 2012; Williams v. Suffolk Circuit Court, No. 3:12-cv-00078-HEH (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2012 & Apr. 29, 2013). We also deny Williams motion for leave to file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion in the district facts court. and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court because presented would not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.