Raheem Rahman v. J. Stouffer, No. 13-6627 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6627 RAHEEM RAHMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; LIEUTENANT DOLLY; SERGEANT WHITACRE; OFFICER HOOVER; GARY MAYNARD, Secretary; DR. GREGORY TAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-03497-WMN) Submitted: August 7, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. FLOYD, Decided: Circuit Judges, and August 21, 2013 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raheem Rahman, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy P. Tennis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O NEILL, O BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raheem Rahman appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rahman v. Stouffer, No. 1:11-cv-03497-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 12, 2013; Apr. 22, 2013). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.