Jesse Yarborough v. Lieutenant Sappington, No. 13-6530 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6530 JESSE YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT CLAUDIUS, SAPPINGTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SEXTON; DR. Defendants Appellees and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TYRANE L. MORGAN; M. BAILEY; J. BASKVILLE; MRS. HOSHER; P.A. FALLON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03083-D) Submitted: September 24, 2013 Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: Circuit September 26, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, FMC BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Following a bench trial on the remaining claims in Jesse Yarborough s civil rights action, which was filed pursuant to Bivens Narcotics, v. 403 Six Unknown U.S. 388 Named (1971), judgment in favor of Defendants. Agents the of Fed. district Bureau court of entered We have reviewed Yarborough s claims on appeal in conjunction with the record, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. ct-03083-D (E.D.N.C. See Yarborough v. Sappington, No. 5:09- Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
