Demar Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney, No. 13-6085 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6085 DEMAR WORRELL, Plaintiff Appellant, v. WAYNE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; MOUNT OLIVE POLICE DEPARTMENT; BRANSON VICKORY, III; MIKE RICKS; LT. TOMMY BROWN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03121-FL) Submitted: May 23, 2013 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. AGEE, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 29, 2013 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Demar Worrell appeals the district court s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by court. the district Attorney s 2012). We Office, No. Worrell v. Wayne 5:12-ct-03121-FL County (E.D.N.C., District Dec. 6, We deny as moot Worrell s motion to expedite decision. dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.