Larry Tart v. Joyce Kornegay, No. 13-6063 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6063 LARRY R. TART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOYCE KORNEGAY; BROWN, FORREST FESTERMAN; FINESSE COUCH; KAREN Defendants - Appellees, and JANITORIAL PRODUCTS PLANT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03236-BO) Submitted: April 25, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. WYNN, Circuit Decided: April 30, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry R. Tart, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Larry dismissing R. without Tart appeals prejudice his the district 42 U.S.C. court s order 1983 (2006) § complaint for failure exhaust administrative remedies. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kornegay, No. dispense with contentions 5:11-ct-03236-BO are oral argument adequately (E.D.N.C. because presented in Jan. the the 4, facts Tart v. 2013). We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED Because the record clearly establishes that exhaustion did not occur, the order is final. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (1993). 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.