US v. Rodney Carter, No. 13-4186 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4186 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. RODNEY CARTER, a/k/a Doc Roc, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (5:12-cr-00031-JPB-JES-1) Submitted: September 9, 2013 Decided: September 24, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brendan S. Leary, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Randolph John Bernard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney Carter pled guilty in accordance with a written plea agreement distribute to and conspiracy to possess distribute ยงยง 841(b)(1)(c), 846 (2006). months in prison. to with oxycodone, intent 21 to U.S.C. Carter was sentenced to thirty He now appeals. His attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Carter was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but did not file such a brief. We affirm in part and dismiss in part. The United States moves to dismiss the appeal based on Carter s waiver in his plea agreement of his right to appeal any sentence determined using a base offense level of 26 or lower. Upon review of the record, including the plea agreement, the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 proceeding, the presentence investigation report, and the sentencing transcript, we conclude that Carter knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence and that the waiver is valid and enforceable. Accordingly, with respect to Carter s sentence, we grant the motion to dismiss. Carter did conviction, however. not waive his right to appeal his We have reviewed the record in accordance with Anders and conclude that Carter knowingly and voluntarily 2 entered his guilty plea, the district court fully complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, and there was a factual basis for the plea. We therefore deny the motion to dismiss insofar as it pertains to Carter s conviction, which we affirm. In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record for meritorious issues and have found none. affirm in part and dismiss in part. We therefore This court requires that counsel inform Carter, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United State for further review. If Carter requests that such a petition be filed, but counsel believes that the petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. motion must Carter. legal before state that a copy of the motion was Counsel s served on We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
