Ronnie Moss v. Maximus Federal Services, No. 13-2469 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2469 RONNIE LYNN MOSS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. MAXIMUS FEDERAL SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; TODAY'S OPTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:13-cv-00562-JAG) Submitted: March 18, 2014 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. DIAZ, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 2, 2014 HAMILTON, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Lynn Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronnie Lynn Moss seeks to appeal the district court s order dismissing without prejudice the particularized complaint he filed in his challenge to the denial of a Medicare claim. The complaint was dismissed after Moss failed to comply with the court s direction documentation remedies. to allege demonstrating additional his facts exhaustion of and provide administrative This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 54(b); Cohen v. 545-46 (1949). 28 U.S.C. Beneficial § 1292 Indus. (2012); Loan Fed. Corp., R. 337 Civ. U.S. P. 541, The order Moss seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as Moss may be able to save his action by filing an amended complaint court. curing the deficiencies identified by the district Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.