Clinchfield Coal Company v. Harold Bostic, No. 13-2420 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2420 CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. HAROLD BOSTIC; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, COMPENSATION Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (13-0046-BLA) Submitted: July 31, 2014 Decided: August 20, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy W. Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph E. Wolfe, Ryan C. Gilligan, WOLFE, WILLIAMS & REYNOLDS, Norton, Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clinchfield Coal Company petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the parties briefs discloses and decision the is record based reversible error. upon on appeal substantial that evidence the Board s is without and Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Bostic, No. 13-0046-BLA (BRB Sept. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral legal contentions are before this and argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials court argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.