In Re: Arthur Rodgers, No. 13-2290 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2290 In Re: ARTHUR RODGERS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:13-cv-02902-CCB) Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Rodgers, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Arthur alleging that Rodgers the petitions district for court a has writ of unduly mandamus, delayed in processing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action and in adjudicating his motion for injunctive relief. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court s docket reveals that the district court has both denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissed Rodgers complaint. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Rodgers case, the mandamus petition, as amended, is moot, and we deny it on that basis. grant Rodgers supplement to request his for mandamus leave petition. to file We an dispense We out-of-time with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.