Anita Homagain v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 13-2254 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2254 ANITA HOMAGAIN; ISHWAR PRASAD TIMILSINA, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: February 11, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anita Homagain, Ishwar Prasad Timilsina, Petitioners Pro Se. Brianne Whelan Cohen, Yamileth G. Davila, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anita Homagain and Ishwar Prasad Timilsina, natives and citizens of Nepal, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ) denying their motion for reconsideration of the denial of their motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. A motion to reconsider asserts that the Board made an error in its earlier decision, and the movant must specify the error of fact or law in the Board s prior decision. C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) reconsider is (2013). reviewed for The abuse denial of of a discretion. See 8 motion 8 to C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the documents accompanying the motion to reopen and the Petitioners motion to reconsider. We conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, dispense with contentions are oral we deny argument adequately the petition because presented in the the for facts review. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.