Iris Gantt v. Colvin Morgan, No. 13-2168 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2168 IRIS SAPP GANTT, Plaintiff Appellant, v. COLVIN THOMAS MORGAN, a/k/a Tom Morgan, a/k/a C. T. Morgan, a/k/a Colvin T. Morgan; THURMO MEDICAL SLEEP PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01123-TDS-JLW) Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Iris Sapp Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. John F. Bloss, HIGGINS BENJAMIN PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina; Daniel Charles Nash, MORGAN, HERRING, MORGAN, GREEN & ROSENBLUTT, LLC, High Point, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Iris Sapp Gantt, a pro se civil litigant, appeals the district court s order dismissing Gantt s civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and See Durden v. United States, 736 F.3d 296, 300 (4th Cir. 2013) (stating that dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gantt v. 2013). legal before Morgan, No. 1:12-cv-01123-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Sept. See 4, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.