Charlie Richardson v. Ray Mabus, No. 13-2144 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2144 CHARLIE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAY MABUS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:13-cv-01207-AW) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlie Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShieldsMinnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charlie Richardson appeals the district court s order granting Ray Mabus s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, on Richardson s discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2013). no reversible error. court s order. and materials legal before Accordingly, we affirm the district Richardson v. Mabus, No. 8:13-cv-01207-AW (D. Md. Aug. 16, 2013). facts We have reviewed the record and find We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.