Michael Knights v. Oxford Global Resources, No. 13-2045 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2045 MICHAEL KNIGHTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OXFORD GLOBAL RESOURCES, (Contracting Capacity); STIHL INCORPORATED, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); EARL SYKES, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); GUY WALLACE, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM) Submitted: January 10, 2014 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. WYNN, Circuit Decided: Judges, and March 7, 2014 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Knights, Appellant Pro Se. Melanie Gayle Augustin, Thomas Joseph Flaherty, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, McLean, Virginia; Sarah Kate McConaughy, Robert W. McFarland, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Knights appeals the district court s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen his civil action. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knights v. Stihl Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00260- RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. July 26, 2013). proceed in forma pauperis. We We grant Knights leave to dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.