Vinaben Patel v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 13-1882 (4th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1882 VINABEN MANUBHAI PATEL; MANUBHAI PATEL, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: February 4, 2014 Decided: February 18, 2014 Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rishi P. Oza, ROBERT BROWN LLC, Cleveland, Ohio, for Petitioners. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Lindsay B. Glauner, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vinaben Manubhai Patel and Manubhai Patel, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ) dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge s order finding that Vinaben Patel, the primary petitioner, was not eligible for adjustment of status. The Petitioners claim that the Board erred in this regard. We deny the petition for review. We review administrative findings of fact for substantial evidence and will consider those findings conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would have been compelled to conclude to the contrary. are reviewed de novo. 448 (4th Cir. 2007). and conclude that Legal issues determined by the Board Abdel-Rahman v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 444, We the have thoroughly reviewed the record factual findings are supported by substantial evidence and there was no error regarding the legal issues. Accordingly, dispense with contentions are oral we deny argument adequately the petition because presented in the the for facts review. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
