Tanya Cetina v. Michelin North America, No. 13-1864 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1864 TANYA LYNN CETINA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA; NEWBOLD SERVICES; CLINT MORGAN; DAVE MURPHY; DAVE BROWN; DAVE MAUGER, Defendants Appellees, and SANDRA CHAVEZ, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:12-cv-02222-TMC-JDA) Submitted: September 24, 2013 Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: Circuit September 26, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tanya Lynn Cetina, Appellant Pro Se. Collie William Lehn, Jr., Fred W. Suggs, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina; Sima Bhakta Patel, Thomas Louis Stephenson, Appellees. NEXSEN PRUET, Greenville, South Carolina, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Tanya Lynn Cetina seeks to appeal the district court s orders adopting the magistrate judge s recommendation to dismiss her claims against Defendants Dave Mauger and Michelin North America, Incorporated. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). several other Defendants Because Cetina s claims against remain, the orders Cetina seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.