Audrey Scott v. TIAA-CREF, No. 13-1829 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1829 AUDREY SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TIAA-CREF, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00697-FDW-DCK) Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Audrey Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Felicia A. Washington, GATES LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. K&L Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Audrey dismissing her retaliation. error. appeals complaint the district alleging court s discrimination order and We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (W.D.N.C. Scott June Scott v. TIAA-CREF, No. 3:12-cv-00697-FDW-DCK 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.