Samuel Harrison v. City of Durham, No. 13-1612 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1612 SAMUEL LYNN HARRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF DURHAM; CITY OF DURHAM EMPLOYEES; FBI/DOJ, All of their Employees and Educators; EEOC, All of their Employees and Educators; NORMENT SECURITY GROUP; CORMETECH, INC.; DOUG MCNAY; CAE USA, INC.; DARREN UGLESS; LOCKHEED MARTIN; NC DOT, Traffic Engineering Division; WALMART, Lumberton, NC; GOSHEN RUBBER, INC., (GNC) Wilson, NC; ROBESON COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Lumberton, NC; LUMBERTON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, Lumberton, NC; CSC - LAWYERS INCORPORATING SERVICE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00082-D) Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Lynn Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samuel Lynn Harrison appeals the district order dismissing his amended complaint as frivolous. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the court s We have Accordingly, district court. Harrison v. City of Durham, No. 5:13-cv-00082-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 2013). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.