Arturo Pulido v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 13-1596 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1596 ARTURO MARTINEZ PULIDO, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: March 13, 2014 Decided: March 19, 2014 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeremy L. McKinney, MCKINNEY PERRY & COALTER, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Edward J. Duffy, Senior Litigation Counsel, John M. McAdams, Jr., Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Arturo Mexico, Martinez petitions for Immigration Appeals immigration judge s Pulido, review ( Board ) denial withholding of removal. * of a native an order dismissing of his and of his citizen the Board of from the asylum and appeal requests for of We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Martinez Pulido s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board s decision. See INS v. Elias Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Apr. 9, 2013). See In re: Martinez Pulido (B.I.A. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED * The immigration judge also denied Martinez Pulido s request for protection under the Convention Against Torture. Martinez Pulido failed, however, to appeal this portion of the immigration judge s decision. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.