Luecretia Owens-El v. Lieutenant Kapfhammer, No. 13-1474 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1474 LUECRETIA DAWN OWENS-EL, f/k/a Luecretia Dawn McNair-Bey; CHE' QUADAFFI WILLIAMS-EL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. LIEUTENANT KAPFHAMMER; GEORGE GITHARA, Officer; CHRISTIAN V. KAIKAI, Officer; JOSEPH LANDSMAN, Defendants Appellees, and JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3; JOHN DOE #4; JOHN DOE #5; JOHN DOE #6, Office all of and from the Western District Police Station for the Baltimore City Police Department; D. M. ROSS, Sergeant, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-03213-JFM) Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. November 25, 2013 Luecretia Dawn Owens-El, Che Quadaffi Williams-El, Appellants Pro Se. Michael Lawrence Marshall, SCHLACHMAN, BELSKY & WEINER, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Suzanne Sangree, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Luecretia Dawn Owens-El and Che Quadaffi Williams-El appeal the district court s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Owens-El v. Kapfhammer, No. 1:10-cv-03213-JFM (D. Md. filed Mar. 8, 2013, entered Mar. 11, 2013; Aug. 22, 2012; filed May 13, 2011, entered May 16, 2011). We grant the motion for an extension of time, deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.