In Re: Vincent Rogers, No. 13-1355 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1355 In re: VINCENT SHAMONT ROGERS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: (7:08-cr-00216-MGL-2) May 23, 2013 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. AGEE, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 28, 2013 HAMILTON, Senior Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent Shamont Rogers, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vincent Shamont Rogers petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for a new trial. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.