Hieda Keeler v. James Fox, No. 13-1328 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1328 HIEDA A. KEELER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. POLICE CHIEF JAMES D. FOX; OFFICER THOMAS A. SHULL, JR.; OFFICER DAVID GREEN; OFFICER JUSTIN BRIGGS; OFFICER MICHELLE RIVERA; SERGEANT JOHN POLAK; LIEUTENANT SUTTON; DETECTIVE M. JOHNSON; OFFICER HOSE H. HERNANDEZ-ZAMORA; CAPTAIN LARRY MINKOFF; NEWPORT NEWS SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF GABE MORGAN; SHERIFF MALE, responded to Riverside; SHERIFF FEMALE, responded to Riverside; VIRGINIA BEACH PSYCHIATRIC CENTER; DR. STEPHEN G. CUNNINGHAM; DR. MARK G. CLARKE; ATTORNEY JUDITH DOCKERY; ATTORNEY CHAD DORSK; OFFICER NEIDENGARD; OFFICER JUNEAU; SERGEANT HINES; OFFICER HANKINS; PAUL COMPTON, Virginia State Police Trooper; TONY PASSARO, Virginia State Police Trooper; DARRELL HOLLOWELL, Virginia State Police Trooper; FEMALE EMT, Newport News EMT; MALE EMT, Newport News EMT; CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00325-AWA-TEM) Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June 25, 2013 Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Rodney Seth Dillman, HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Megan Paulita Bradshaw, Dante Medardo Filetti, GOODMAN, ALLEN & FILETTI, PLLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Farnaz Farkish, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Joshua James Coe, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Darlene P. Bradberry, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Hieda A. Keeler appeals the district court s order denying her Motion to deny Consent Order Granting Substitution of Attorney, Motion for Hearing, and Motion for Recusal, and dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. have reviewed the record Accordingly, although we pauperis, affirm court. we before find the reversible leave grant no to proceed reasons stated by error. in the forma district Keeler v. Fox, No. 2:12-cv-00325-AWA-TEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2013). legal for and We We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
