Robert Green, Sr. v. Mayor and City Council, No. 13-1319 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1319 ROBERT E. GREEN, SR., Plaintiff Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; SOD DECOY SQUAD; CARL STAMBAUGH, Officer; OTHER MEMBERS OF THE BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:99-cv-02941-MJG) Submitted: June 27, 2013 Decided: July 12, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Green, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. William Rowe Phelan, Jr., BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Mayor and City Council. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert E. Green, Sr., appeals the district court s orders of March 16 and March 22, 2005 barring him from access to the courthouse without leave of court and limiting the subject and manner of his filings in this closed civil action. We dismiss the appeal of the 2005 orders for lack of jurisdiction because the appeal of those orders was not timely filed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). court s order disagreement denying with the See Green also appeals the district Green s limits on recent his motion filing and expressing courthouse access. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court s order. Green v. Mayor and City Council, No. 1:99-cv-02941-MJG (D. Md. Feb. 4, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense oral with contentions are argument adequately because presented in the the facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.