Robert Cox v. Judy McMahon, No. 13-1284 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1284 ROBERT M. COX; CHERIE M. COX, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. JUDY MCMAHON; PAUL GARFINKEL; JOCELYN CATE; GREG FORMAN; DEBORAH LEWIS; STUART FELDMAN; PAUL SCHWARTZ, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert M. Cox, Cherie M. Cox, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert and Cherie Cox appeal the district court s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. McMahon, No. 2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 14, & 31, 2013). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.