In Re: Clarence Hicks, No. 13-1269 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1269 IN RE: CLARENCE HICKS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:98-cr-00259-ELH-9) Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Hicks, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clarence Hicks petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his two motions filed in connection with his criminal conviction and sentence. district He court seeks to an order from this Our review of act. court the directing district the court s docket reveals that the district court denied both motions by order entered April 19, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Hicks case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.