Kendall Smith v. EEOC, No. 13-1117 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1117 KENDALL SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. (EEOC) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendant - Appellee, and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA (CWA) - District 2; CWA LOCAL 2336; CWA AFL-CIO; CLC; VERIZON WASHINGTON DC INC.; VERIZON MARYLAND INC.; VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.; NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (NLRB), MD & DC; DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (DOL); REED SMITH LLP, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:12-cv-00027-AW) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. April 3, 2013 Kendall Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Gary John Hozempa, Tracy Hudson Spicer, U. S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, DC, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Kendall Smith appeals the district court s order dismissing Smith s civil complaint against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Equal Emp t Opportunity Comm n, No. 8:12-cv-00027-AW (D. Md. Dec. 26, 2012). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials We dispense with legal contentions are before this and court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.