Banoro Garrett v. The Norfolk Police Department, No. 13-1092 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1092 BANORO GARRETT, Plaintiff Appellant, v. THE NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE NORFOLK SHERIFF S OFFICE; THE CITY OF NORFOLK; LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER; SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS; OFFICER D. A. PACIFICO; OFFICER H. G. WHITE; ROBERT J. MCCABE; LIEUTENANT BONILLA; SERGEANT G. SNYDER; DEPUTY TAYLOR; M/DEPUTY A. MEARS; L. WILLIS; P. BELL; J. CUMMINS, L.P.N.; J. KIDD; DARRELL HILL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Banoro Garrett seeks to appeal the district court s order dismissing (2006) action. some Defendants from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 545-46 (1949). Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, The order Garrett seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2