Glorbman Brown v. J. Ewart, No. 12-8028 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8028 GLORBMAN LAMONT BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. EWART, CLASSIFICATION OFFICER; NURSE MORGAN; DEPUTY FAGGART; OFFICER A. LANE; LIEUTENANT LANE, MASTER Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00573-CCE-LPA) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glorbman Lamont Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Ray Raynor, TEMPLETON & RAYNOR, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Glorbman Lamont Brown appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Ewart, No. 1:09-cv-00573-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2012; Jan. 28, 2013). * counsel. We deny Brown s motion to appoint We deny Appellees motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We construe Brown s Traverse to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Appeal as a timely notice of appeal from the district court s final order. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.