Larry Williams v. Warden Bodison, No. 12-7930 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7930 LARRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S. WARDEN BODISON; WARDEN W. THOMPSON; CAPTAIN BRITEHART; GOODWIN GEORGE; LIEUTENANT D. MAGHEE; SERGEANT JOHNSON; WARDEN HUNTER; SERGEANT WILSON; MR. JON OZMINT; COMMISSARY STAFF MAHAFFEX; SERGEANT SANFORD; NFN JEFFERSON, Commissary Staff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-03321-MBS-JRM) Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Larry complaint court s in Williams the order filed district dismissing a court. his 42 He action U.S.C. § appeals without 1983 the (2006) district prejudice for failure to comply with the magistrate judge s order to provide the court with addresses for the defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of a complaint that satisfies the requirements of the district court, we conclude that the district court s order is neither a final collateral order. order nor an appealable interlocutory or Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.