Samuel Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel, No. 12-7784 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7784 SAMUEL LAMONT WHITNER, Plaintiff Appellant, v. DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL LESLEY TIFFANY N. RICHARDSON, M. COGGIOLA; STAFF ATTORNEY Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:12-cv-01876-CMC) Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Lamont Whitner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samuel Lamont Whitner appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Whitner s civil action. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Counsel Lesley M. Sept. 13, 2012). facts and materials legal before Coggiola, No. Whitner v. Disciplinary 3:12-cv-01876-CMC (D.S.C. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.