US v. Mark Howell, No. 12-7670 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7670 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARK ALLEN HOWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:08-cr-00041-BO-1; 4:11-cv-00185-BO) Submitted: March 25, 2013 Decided: April 4, 2013 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul K. Sun, Jr., ELLIS & WINTERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Yvonne V. Watford-McKinney, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mark Allen Howell appeals the district court s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court s order. United States v. Howell, No. 4:08-cr-00041-BO-1 See (E.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2012); cf. Lo v. Endicott, 506 F.3d 572, 575 (7th Cir. 2007); E.J.R.E. v. United States, 453 F.3d 1094, 1098 (8th Cir. 2006); Shannon v. Newland, 410 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir. 2005). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.