US v. Donzel Stinson, No. 12-7654 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7654 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONZEL FREDRICKUS STINSON, a/k/a Shack, a/k/a Shaq, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-20) Submitted: January 10, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donzel Fredrickus Stinson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Donzel Fredrickus Stinson appeals the district court s order denying his motion for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm Stinson s motion for appointment of counsel. argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials the See United States v. Stinson, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-20 (Aug. 23, 2012). oral for We deny We dispense with legal contentions are before this and court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.