US v. Claude Bellamy, No. 12-7613 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7613 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLAUDE WENDELL BELLAMY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00049-F-1) Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 16, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Claude Wendell Bellamy appeals the district court s order denying his motion to review findings of historical facts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United (E.D.N.C. Sept. States 4, 2012). v. Bellamy, We No. dispense 7:99-cr-00049-F-1 with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.