Habeeb Malik v. James Sligh, Jr., No. 12-7576 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7576 HABEEB ABDUL MALIK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES E. SLIGH, JR.; JANNITA GASTON; BERNARD MCKIE; JON E. OZMINT; BILL BYARS; VAUGHN JACKSON; ROBERT E. WARD; TRAVIS REESE, All sued in their individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (5:11-cv-01064-RBH) Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Habeeb Abdul Malik, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Habeeb Abdul Malik appeals the district court s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sept. 4, 2012). facts and materials Malik legal before v. We Sligh, dispense No. with 5:11-cv-01064-RBH oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court because presented would (D.S.C. not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.