US v. Pedro Hill, No. 12-7485 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7485 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. PEDRO F. HILL, a/k/a Pedro Falcon Hill, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00028-REP-1) Submitted: January 16, 2013 Decided: March 6, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pedro F. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Childs Ackley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Pedro Falcon Hill appeals the district court s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence Guidelines conclude based Manual the on (2011). district denying the motion. 200 (4th Amendment Cir. court We did 750 have not to the U.S. reviewed abuse the its Sentencing record discretion 2012). We v. 2010) Hill, in See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, (standard of review). Accordingly, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. States and No. 3:07-cr-00028-REP-1 (E.D. Va. we See United Aug. 22, Furthermore, we deny Hill s motion to appoint counsel. dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.