US v. David Beeks, No. 12-7457 (4th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7457 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID LAMONT BEEKS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:01-cr-00828-HMH-12) Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Lamont Beeks, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Lamont Beeks appeals the district court s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed Accordingly, § 3582(c)(2) court. we the record affirm motion for the the and find court s reasons no reversible order stated denying by the error. Beeks district United States v. Beeks, No. 6:01-cr-00828-HMH-12 (D.S.C. July 27, 2012). We also conclude that the district court lacked authority to entertain Beeks motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court s order denying Beeks motion for reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
