Anthony Williams v. US, No. 12-7365 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7365 ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Formally sued as Rodney Blacknall ATF Agent; Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau, Defendant - Appellee. No. 12-7381 ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. OFFICER BRIGGS, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity; ROBERT J. WISE, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity; CHIP R. BUSKER, Sergeant, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity; KYLE J. O'DELL, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity; J. E. HARTNESS, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. No. 12-7386 ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. RICK F. HETZEL, SBI Agent, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00594-RJC; 3:12-cv-00097RJC; 3:11-cv-00443-RJC) Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 20, 2012 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Richard Rustin Perlungher, CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, Charlotte, North Carolina; Angel Evon Gray, Jennifer Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorneys General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Williams appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints related to his 2002 arrest and 2003 conviction and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by court. the district Williams v. United States, No. 3:11-cv-00594-RJC (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2012); Williams v. Briggs, No. 3:12-cv-00097-RJC Williams v. Hetzel, Aug. 6, 2012). We dispense contentions May 31 3:11-cv-00443-RJC & Aug. (W.D.N.C. 6, 2012); July 3 & We grant Williams motion to substitute brief. with are No. (W.D.N.C. oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.