US v. Tony Hoey, No. 12-7354 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TONY HOEY, a/k/a Sld Dft 13, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-MR-13) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Hoey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tony Hoey appeals the district court s orders denying relief on § 3582(c) his motion (2006). reversible error. We for have reduction reviewed of the sentence, record 18 and U.S.C. find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hoey, No. 4:96-cr- 00053-MR-13 (W.D.N.C. June 6, 2012; Aug. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.