US v. Dirk Ladson, No. 12-7249 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7249 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DIRK LADSON, a/k/a Dezo, a/k/a Eugene Martin, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-10) Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dirk Ladson, Appellant Pro Se. Assistant United States Attorney, Appellee. Melissa Elaine O Boyle, Norfolk, Virginia, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dirk Ladson appeals the district court s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Our review of not the record demonstrates Ladson s Guidelines range. court s order. that Amendment 750 did alter Accordingly, we affirm the district United States v. Ladson, No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ- 10 (E.D. Va. filed July 12, 2012; entered July 13, 2012). dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.